Increase internal efficiency and collaboration between engineering and production

No automatic transformation from Engineering BoM to Manufacturing BoM

The Bill of Materials (BoM) that derives from the engineering department is not compatible for use in production. Therefore, a seamless translation into a Manufacturing Bill of Materials is critical. Unfortunately, this transformation still appears to be mostly done manually, often in Excel, leaving room for human error and inefficiency.

Lack of a centralized source for all product-related information

Often, product-related information is still decentralized within different departments, such as engineering and production. The lack of a single central source of truth creates an environment where manual errors, duplicates and tensions between engineering and production departments run free.

No clear change management

Is your engineering department facing challenges when it comes to effectively communicating component replacements across the entire organization? Clear and unified communication in this area is not always straightforward.

Even when the production department identifies issues—such as components that don’t fit—it remains a significant challenge to relay these problems accurately and efficiently to the engineering team, especially when there is no well-defined revision management process. In some instances, inadequate communication between the two departments results in engineering not promptly addressing feedback or becoming aware of specific issues until later. Consequently, production continues to encounter the same problems. Timely problem identification is crucial. The farther down the organizational chain changes need to be accommodated, the more costly it becomes for the company.

Separated mechanical and electrical designs

Within manufacturing companies, there are usually two engineering departments: one specializing in mechanical designs and the other handling electrical designs. This often results in the supply of separate Bills of Materials to the production department, which is more difficult to interpret than one Bill of Materials (where the two are combined). Some companies even work with three engineering designs: mechanical, electrical and electronics. These too, are ought to be delivered to production in one Bill of Materials.

Lack of user-friendly tools within production

A common struggle for companies is using the right, user-friendly tools to improve communication between engineering and production. In fact, not every tool is as user-friendly and easy to handle from the production department.

Difficult to find data from previous projects

When the engineering department seeks to reutilize specific components from a prior project for a new initiative, this endeavor often presents significant challenges. Finding the right components can be a real quest, especially since they are scattered across different folders without a clear structure.

Unclear product drawings and information for production

Often companies are left with unclear product drawings and/or instructions, making it not always obvious to assemble/make a product. Using 3D design can make this process easier.

Also, the new generations of designers entering the field are more familiar with working with 3D data.

A disorganized jungle of documents and certificates

Companies often find it difficult to clearly structure and link certificates and documentation to specific designs or components. Consider, for example, an ISO certificate or a vibration analysis that was performed on the product.